False Facts About False Beliefs - 1075 Words

Question 1: When something cannot be confirmed or is false, and is considered to be negative proof, this is called The Socratic Method. False beliefs can be eliminated using this particular method. The form of an argument is based on the purpose of a proposed hypothesis, then to see if the expected implications materialize. If the hypothesis does not appear to materialize, it is considered wrong. Therefore, if the hypothesis were true, the expected implications would not have followed. A quote from Socrates states: If I could only find a man wiser than myself then I might go to the god with a refutation in my hand. Socrates found that he was more knowledgeable then these men and never did he presume to be more knowledgeable than he was. He recognized that he was more knowledgeable but realized the point when he did not know something. The hypothesis would be for him to find someone more knowledgeable than himself and when this did not materialize, the hypothesis would have to be discarded. Throughout various Socratic works, this theme is re occurring. As oppose to just satisfying ones immediate desires, one must be virtuous. According to the will of the gods, life, which is well lived, prosperous and long, is not necessarily a good life. Simply he using this concept towards his prosecution manifests the Socratic Method into Plato’s dialogue, the Euthyphro. He used this concept towards ethical matters. It was first suggested throughout the Euthyphro thatShow MoreRelatedFalse Belief Tasks Of Children1693 Words   |  7 Pagesinterested in false-belief tasks in children. There is a lot of research in child psychology and development that relates to false belief tasks, but the aspect I found most interesting was how false belief tasks relate to children’s ability to lie. It was a theory that children who were unable to pass false belief tasks were unable to intend to deceive, because they lacked the understanding of false belief necessary to understand how to deceive someone. Without an understanding of false beliefs a childRead MoreCognitivism in Philosophy Essay1670 Words   |  7 PagesAfter that I will talk about some positives and negatives of non-cognitivism. Finally, I will tell you where I stand on the meta-ethics argument of cognitivism and non-cognitivism and why I agree with that theory. First thing I will go over, and break down cognitivism and non-cognitvism in meta-ethic philosophy. Cognitivism in philosophy is the meta-ethical theory that moral judgments state facts and are either true or false. Moral judgments are, or express states of beliefs. A strong cognitivistRead MorePlato s View On Epistemology1459 Words   |  6 Pagesknowledge; the knowledge of facts. It is composed of three separate conditions, truth, belief, and justification. I will begin by explaining the truth condition. This condition is generally unrefuted by epistemologists for how can we know something that is false? We can think we know something and then it turns out we don’t, but that just means we were wrong to think we knew it. For example, it is false that Anne Boleyn was the first president of the United States, and since it is false it is not the sortRead MoreThe Gettier Problem Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?1718 Words   |  7 PagesTripartite Theory of Knowledge- which s tates that Justified True Belief equaled knowledge- was fact. This means that with three conditions, one could know something. Firstly, if you believe something, secondly, if you have justification for believing, and thirdly, that your belief is in fact true. If all three of these conditions were met, then this amounted to knowledge. However, with the publication of Gettier’s paper, â€Å"Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?†, he attempted to prove, with the aid of a numberRead MoreThe Theory And The Coherence Theory Essay1316 Words   |  6 Pagescorrespondence theory and the coherence theory. Put simply, the former argues that a proposition is true if and only if it corresponds or relates to facts, while the latter claims that for a proposition to be true it must cohere with a set of beliefs (Walker, 1989). While both theories are positioned as competing ideas about how it can be determined whether or not a belief is true, the paper argues that the correspondence and coherence theories are insufficient to explain the meaning of truth. Instead, theRead MoreWhat is Absolute Truth? Essay1318 Words   |  6 Pagestrue or false. The truth can be something that appeals to a person, or that it can reason with a persons knowledge that they have already develop. The knowledge we possess can shape the way we think, so does this also change the in the truth that a person sees. Our knowledge also limits us to what we considered to be true. In our century every year we discover something new so our truth is constantly changing. One of the conflicts that also comes to mind when talking about true and false is whetherRead MoreThe Obligatory Elements For Establishing Fraudulent Misrepresentation1457 Words   |  6 Pagesan action for fraud and damages to the other party (Bob Wheelie). The sufficient evidence validates that: Mr Spokes held prior knowledge about the business claiming a false statement of fact; Mr Spokes provided the statement in order to induce Bob into entering the contract; Mr Spokes employed the use of misrepresentation knowing that such representation was false and would cause detrimental repercussions; and as a result Bob Wheelie suffered economic loss. Therefore, these findings indicate that BobRead MoreReport : A Lot Of Research 1013 Words   |  5 PagesIntro + Summary: A lot of research has been going on focusing on an infants ability to understand false beliefs. Researchers are emphasizing on an infants ability to understand mental representations. However, at the same time being critical of some of these assumptions underlying such premises is very important. Luo (2011) is one of the researchers who tried to test the idea of false beliefs in 10 month old infants. In his first experiment, Luo(2011) reported that the infants responded with increasedRead MoreThe Goal Of Any Philosopher1559 Words   |  7 Pagesthe one thing that has real meaning life. Truth is essential to understanding the world. All knowledge is based upon truth. The Idea of truth is first and for most a conviction of the mind. The mind has an inclination to view something to be true, false; we are convicted to believe one or the other. For example, if one were holding a model car that appears to be red, you can be convinced it is red; you can also be convinced it is red, dark red, pink, or even burgundy. One’s mind can perceive the carRead MoreSocrates s Argument At 30a B Of The Apology1386 Words   |  6 PagesEssay #1 In this paper I will argue that Socrates’s argument at 30a-b of the Apology that the best possible state of the soul is the most important thing in life means to eliminate false beliefs and to have virtue. Specifically, I will show why Socrates wants to eliminate false beliefs and why he insist on having virtue is important in life. Then I will demonstrate why Socrates’ argument is incorrect because he fails to identify the true catalyst that drives his happiness. I conclude Socrates’s